ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2023 7.2
Vol. 65. Num. 11.
Pages 1056-1058 (November 2012)

Ischemic Heart Disease in Women. Data From BARIHD Study

Cardiopatía isquémica en la mujer. Datos del estudio CIBAR

Rafael Vidal-PérezaFernando Otero-RaviñabJosé Luis Gómez VázquezcJosé Antonio Santos RodríguezdConcepción De Frutos De MarcoseJosé Ramón González-Juanateya
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2012;65:106610.1016/j.rec.2012.06.008
Carlos Escobar, Vivencio Barrios

Options

To the Editor,

The relationship between ischemic heart disease and sex is evidenced by continuing differences between men and women in treatment and secondary prevention strategies and their outcomes. Nevertheless, progress has been made over the last decade.1, 2, 3 The aim of our study was to characterize differences by sex in the clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of an initial cohort of 1108 patients with chronic ischemic heart disease drawn from primary care (PC) practice, and with a minimum of 1 year of evolution after the first episode. Patients were from the CIBAR (Barbanza Ischemic Heart Disease) study, a prospective, multicenter, cohort study launched in 2007 in which, over a one month period, 69 PC physicians enrolled patients over 18 years with a previous diagnosis of ischemic heart disease and evolution of at least one year according to the hospital discharge report. All patients provided signed informed consent to participate. All baseline data were obtained at the initial PC visit. The influence of diabetes in these patients has already been published.4 A later publication, after a mean follow-up of over 2 years and with only 13 patients lost to follow-up (1.2%), provided additional prognostic information on the cohort.5 Data from the same cohort was used for the present analysis.

Table 1 describes the clinical features, risk factors, comorbidities, diagnostic tests, and treatment of patients included at baseline by sex. Table 2 shows hospital admissions and mortality during follow-up, again by sex. The most relevant results of this analysis were the differences in risk factor distribution, with higher rates of obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, and lower rates of smoking in women, and the fact that women in the cohort were younger than men, an unusual finding when compared to other series. We also observed a less aggressive approach to diagnosis in women, and noted that their ischemic heart disease less frequently manifested as myocardial infarction. Disease management tended to be less invasive in women. With regards to treatment, no differences were found by sex in terms of the degree to which treatments recommended in clinical practice guidelines for these patients (antiplatelet agents, statins or beta blockers) were indicated, although adherence to treatment was not systematically assessed. Women did less exercise than men. Regarding prognosis, mortality was low in these patients overall, a finding which may be partly explained by the fact that at least one year had passed since the first episode; it is in that one year period immediately after the episode when mortality rates are highest. After 2 years of follow up, we observed no statistically significant differences by sex in mortality or hospitalization, although the sample was not large enough (due to the small number of women) for the data to be considered definitive.

Table 1. Clinical Features, Risk Factors, Comorbidities, Diagnostic Tests, and Patient Treatment in the CIBAR Study. Distribution by Sex.

  Total Men Women P
Patients 1108 (100) 798 (72) 310 (28)  
Age, years 69.2±11.1 71.1±9.8 68.5±11.5 <.001
Stable angina 258 (23.3) 166 (20.9) 92 (29.3) .003
Unstable angina 243 (21.9) 156 (19.6) 87 (27.7) .004
Acute myocardial infarct 607 (54.8) 472 (59.4) 135 (43) <.001
High blood pressure 726 (65.5) 478 (60.2) 248 (79.4) <.001
Dyslipidemia 779 (70.3) 542 (67.9) 237 (76.5) .009
Diabetes 318 (28.7) 212 (26.6) 106 (34.2) .015
Current smoker 110 (9.9) 100 (12.5) 10 (3.2) <.001
Obesity a 436 (39.4) 289 (36.2) 147 (47.4) .001
Central obesity b 604 (54.5) 367 (46) 237 (76.5) <.001
Metabolic syndrome c 490 (44.2) 309 (38.7) 181 (58.4) <.001
Previous heart failure 120 (10.8) 81 (10.2) 39 (12.6) .238
Atrial fibrillation 159 (14.4) 105 (13.2) 54 (17.4) .071
Ictus 97 (8.8) 66 (8.3) 31 (10) .407
Peripheral vascular disease 153 (13.8) 122 (15.3) 31 (10) .025
Valve disease 175 (15.8) 108 (13.5) 67 (21.6) .001
Echocardiogram 854 (77.1) 622 (77.9) 232 (74.8) .266
Ergometry 617 (55.7) 453 (57.1) 160 (51.3) .077
Coronary catheterization 827 (74.6) 628 (78.7) 199 (64.2) <.001
Multivessel lesion 405 (49) 324 (51.6) 81 (40.3) <.001
Coronary angioplasty 439 (39.6) 347 (43.5) 92 (29.7) <.001
Coronary artery bypass surgery 195 (17.6) 161 (20.3) 34 (10.8) <.001
Antiplatelet treatment 914 (82.5) 668 (83.7) 246 (79.4) .094
Anticoagulants 184 (16.6) 127 (15.9) 57 (18.4) .324
Nitrates 571 (51.5) 397 (49.7) 174 (56.1) .061
Beta blockers 665 (60) 487 (61) 178 (57.4) .275
ACE inhibitors and/or ARBs 674 (60.8) 466 (58.4) 208 (67.1) .009
Calcium channel blockers 422 (38.1) 288 (36.1) 134 (43.2) .033
Diuretics 367 (33.1) 237 (29.7) 130 (41.9) <.001
Statins 967 (87.3) 695 (87.1) 272 (87.7) .841
Physical exercise d 850 (76.7) 630 (79.3) 230 (70.1) .001

ARB, angiotensin II receptor blockers; ACE, angiotensin-converting-enzyme.
Data are n (%) or mean±standard deviation.

a Body mass index>30.
b Abdominal perimeter≥102cm in men, ≥88cm in women.
c Based on ATP-III 2001.
d Defined as any aerobic exercise lasting over 20 min, at least 3 times a week.

Table 2. Mortality and Hospital Admissions During Follow-up of Patients in the CIBAR Study. Distribution by Sex.

  Total Men Women P
Patients 1095 (100) 787 (71.9) 308 (28.1)  
Total mortality 78 (7.1) 53 (6.7) 25 (8.1) .434
Cardiovascular mortality 44 (4) 28 (3.6) 16 (5.2) .232
Non-cardiovascular mortality 34 (3.1) 25 (3.2) 9 (2.9) .949
Total admissions 358 (32.7) 261 (33.2) 97 (31.5) .617
Cardiovascular admissions 191 (17.4) 143 (18.2) 48 (15.6) .331
Death and/or admission 372 (34) 269 (34.2) 103 (33.4) .832
Cardiovascular death and/or cardiovascular admission 207 (18.9) 152 (19.3) 55 (17.9) .607

Data are number of cases (%). Mean follow up, 800±114.2 days.

CIBAR is one of the few studies on ischemic heart disease in Spain to be carried out in a PC setting and provides information on how the contemporary management of these patients and their prognosis matches current clinical practice guidelines.

Our study results also reflect observations made in previous reviews about ischemic heart disease in women,2 with invasive studies and interventional treatment continuing to be less frequent in women. Nevertheless, when compared with the results of the ESPERANZA study from Conthe et al. from almost 10 years ago,6 there have been improvements in the use of pharmacological treatments, to the point where there are now no differences by sex on this parameter. Despite improvements in the last decade,1, 3 the increase in obesity and diabetes in Spain, risk factors which are also prevalent in women in the CIBAR study, is a cause for considerable concern. The lower levels of physical activity among women in the CIBAR study likely contribute to this increased prevalence.

The information obtained in this study provides a useful insight into the presentation and management of chronic ischemic heart disease in PC and serves as a warning to ensure that women are managed more in accordance with current clinical practice guidelines. In the CIBAR study, no differences were found by sex regarding prognosis, but differences were observed in the distribution of risk factors, in the use of diagnostic coronary angiography, and in revascularization strategies. In light of current clinical practice recommendations, all of these require improvement.

Corresponding author: rafavidal@hotmail.com

Bibliography
[1]
Mosca L, Barrett-Connor E, Wenger NK..
Sex/gender differences in cardiovascular disease prevention: what a difference a decade makes..
Circulation. , (2011), 124 pp. 2145-2154
[2]
Heras M..
Cardiopatía isquémica en la mujer: presentación clínica, pruebas diagnósticas y tratamiento de los síndromes coronarios agudos..
Rev Esp Cardiol. , (2006), 59 pp. 371-381
[3]
Franco M, Cooper R, Bilal U, Fuster V..
Control de los factores de riesgo coronarios y terapias basadas en la evidencia: esfuerzos coordinados para la prevención cardiovascular en España..
Rev Esp Cardiol. , (2011), 64 pp. 962-964
[4]
Otero Raviña F, Mazón-Ramos P, Grigorian-Shamagian L, Nores-Lorenzo A, Zugaza-Gurruchaga L, Seoane-Blanco R, et al..
Influencia de la diabetes en las características clínicas y el pronóstico de pacientes con cardiopatía isquémica crónica. Estudio CIBAR..
Rev Esp Cardiol. , (2010), 63 pp. 1371-1376
[5]
Vidal-Pérez R, Otero-Raviña F, Franco M, Rodríguez García JM, Liñares Stolle R, Esteban Álvarez R, et al..
Determinants of cardiovascular mortality in a cohort of primary care patients with chronic ischemic heart disease. BARbanza Ischemic Heart Disease (BARIHD) study..
[6]
Conthe P, Lobos JM, González-Juanatey JR, Gil A, Pajuelo J, Novials A..
Diferencias en la atención de las mujeres con alto riesgo cardiovascular respecto a los varones: estudio multidisciplinar..
Med Clin (Barc). , (2003), 120 pp. 451-455
Are you a healthcare professional authorized to prescribe or dispense medications?