ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2023 7.2
Vol. 70. Num. 12.
Pages 1145-1147 (December 2017)

Scientific letter
Impact of Autoimmune Disease on the Management and Prognosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Impacto de las enfermedades autoinmunitarias en el tratamiento y el pronóstico del síndrome coronario agudo

Nuria Lozano RivasaFrancisco J. Pastor-PérezbPedro J. Flores-BlancobCarlos Marras Fernández-CidaLuis F. LinaresaSergio Manzano-Fernándezb

Options

To the Editor,

Patients with autoimmune disease have worse short-term prognosis after acute coronary syndrome (ACS).1–3 Studies are needed in Spain to analyze the possible reasons for this and to determine long-term prognosis after discharge from hospital.

This was a retrospective observational study of patients admitted to a tertiary hospital for ACS between January 2011 and February 2016. The study was conducted according to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethics committee of the hospital.

The primary objective was to determine the prognostic influence of autoimmune disease on all-cause death, type 3 to 5 major bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification,4 and a composite endpoint of nonfatal acute myocardial infarction and stroke. The primary objective was assessed in patients who were alive after at least 1 year of follow-up (n = 1742). Events were recorded by telephone contact or extracted from medical records. The secondary objective was to determine the characteristics, presentation, and treatment of ACS in patients with and without autoimmune disease. For this objective, the overall population was analyzed (n = 2236).

The effect of autoimmune disease was calculated by Cox regression with adjustment for age, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, neoplasms, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Killip score ≥ 2 on admission, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin, troponin T, glomerular filtration rate, left main coronary artery disease and/or 3-vessel coronary artery disease, and ventricular function. The cumulative incidence of events was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and was compared using the log-rank test.

Among patients with ACS, 74 had autoimmune disease (prevalence of 3.3%). Of these, the most prevalent were rheumatoid arthritis (24 patients), spondyloarthritis (14 patients), and inflammatory bowel disease (10 patients). The median duration of autoimmune disease was 14 years (interquartile range, 4-14 years). Seventy percent of the patients were receiving corticosteroid treatment, 50% disease-modifying therapy/immunosuppressants, 22% anti-inflammatory agents, and 8% biological therapy.

There was a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation and obstructive pulmonary disease in patients with autoimmune diseases as well as higher systolic blood pressure, heart rate, hemoglobin, and ejection fraction. In both groups, coronary angiography and revascularization (preferentially percutaneous) were performed in a high percentage of patients (84% in both groups; P = .901). Complete revascularization and use of drug-eluting stents were reported in similar percentages of patients (Table). There was a higher proportion of left main coronary artery disease and/or 3-vessel coronary artery disease in patients without autoimmune disease (21% vs 11%, P = .043).

Table.

Differences in Baseline Characteristics, Presentation, and Additional Tests According to the Presence of Autoimmune Disease

Variables  Without AID  With AID  P 
Patients, n  2162  74   
Baseline characteristics
Age, y  68 ± 13  67 ± 13  .863 
Males  1603 (74)  51 (69)  .310 
Diabetes mellitus  1044 (48)  29 (39)  .122 
Hypertension  1573 (73)  52 (70)  .632 
Dyslipidemia  1595 (74)  55 (74)  .921 
Smoking  1248 (58)  47(64)  .323 
Prior ischemic heart disease  863 (40)  30 (41)  .917 
Chronic heart failure  115 (5)  5 (7)  .590 
Cerebrovascular disease  255 (12)  6 (8)  .331 
Peripheral artery disease  174 (8)  9 (12)  .205 
Atrial fibrillation/flutter  312 (15)  19 (26)  .008 
Malignancy  100 (5)  2 (3)  .435 
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease  226 (11)  18 (24)  < .001 
Signs and symptoms
Chest pain  1819 (85)  60 (81)  .885 
Dyspnea  118 (6)  6 (8)  .833 
Cardiac arrest  51 (2)  2 (3)  .939 
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg  134.4 ± 28.0  127.6 ± 28.1  .038 
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg  72.6 ± 15.2  70.8 ± 15.2  .309 
Heart rate, bpm  76.6 ± 18.8  82 ± 20.1  .014 
Killip score ≥ 2  486 (23)  22 (30)  .152 
Laboratory parameters
Glucose, mg/dL  162.1 ± 80.2  165.7 ± 82.5  .702 
Glomerular filtration rate (MDRD), mL/1.73 m2  77.6 ± 27.2  71.7 ± 26.1  .066 
Hemoglobin, g/dL  13.8 ± 1.9  13.1 ± 2.2  .001 
Ultrasensitive troponin T, ng/L  31 [8-159]  31 [3-254]  .883 
Revascularization strategy
Coronary angiography  1886 (89)  65 (88)  .862* 
Revascularization  1556 (84)  54 (84)  .901 
Complete revascularization  1064 (57)  35 (55)  .853 
Percutaneous intervention  1469 (78)  53 (82)  .516 
Use of drug-eluting stents  1145 (61)  35 (54)  .280 
Myocardial revascularization surgery  80 (4)  1 (2)  .283 
Left ventricular ejection fraction, %  53.8 ± 12.2  50.2 ± 15.6  .016 

AID, autoimmune disease; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease 4.

Unless otherwise indicated, values are expressed as n (%), mean ± SD, or median [interquartile range].

*

Referenced to the overall population (the other percentages refer to patients who underwent coronary angiography).

A numerically higher proportion of patients was treated with clopidogrel as the second antiplatelet agent in patients with autoimmune disease (81% vs 71%, P = .079). No differences were detected in the use of other drugs used for secondary prevention (P > .1 for all comparisons).

After a median follow-up of 397 days (interquartile range, 375-559 days), patients with an autoimmune disease had a higher mortality rate on discharge (25.8% vs 10.9%; log-rank test, P = .001) (Figure A). Of the 15 deaths in patients with autoimmune disease, 11 were of cardiovascular causes (7 sudden deaths and 4 due to acute myocardial infarction). Major bleeding tended to occur more frequently in patients with autoimmune disease (10.3% vs 4.2%; log-rank test, P = .089), and almost 70% were of gastrointestinal origin (Figure B).

Figure.

Kaplan-Meier curves. Overall mortality (A) and major bleeding (B) after discharge according to presence of autoimmune diseases (AID).

(0.14MB).

Autoimmune disease is an independent risk factor for death after discharge (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-3.62; P,=,.035). There was a trend toward a higher risk of major bleeding events (aHR = 2.35; 95% CI, 1.0-6.9; P = .055). The aHR for stroke and repeat infarction was 1.66 (95%CI, 0.77-3.61; P = .200).

Our series provides relevant information on long-term prognosis, with follow-up of more than 1 year, which has not been reported previously.1–3 The majority of deaths in patients with autoimmune disease were of cardiovascular causes, and therefore a certain vulnerability persists after ACS despite similar treatment and clinical presentation. These patients are also vulnerable to bleeding. Recently, it has been shown that a combination of traditional risk factors, atherosclerotic load, and extent of coronary artery disease can identify patients at long-term risk after ACS, but the predictive power is moderate.5 The risk of long-term bleeding risk is, on the other hand, is only weakly predicted.6 In view of our results, autoimmune disease may be considered a comorbidity that can help in general stratification of our patients after ACS.

Given the limited number of patients with autoimmune disease, we pooled them together for analysis, and therefore this population comprised a heterogenous group. Another limitation of the study is that the specific treatment was recorded on admission for ACS but not in the preceding years, which would have better reflected the temporal relationship.

References
[1]
S. Van Doornum, C. Brand, V. Sundararajan, A.E. Ajani, I.P. Wicks.
Rheumatoid arthritis patients receive less frequent acute reperfusion and secondary prevention therapy after myocardial infarction compared with the general population.
Arthritis Res Ther., (2010), 12 pp. R183
[2]
Ä. Mantel, M. Holmqvist, T. Jernberg, S. Wållberg-Jonsson, J. Askling.
Rheumatoid arthritis is associated with a more severe presentation of acute coronary syndrome and worse short-term outcome.
Eur Heart J., (2015), 36 pp. 3413-3422
[3]
I. Ben-Zvi, I. Goldenberg, S. Matetzky, et al.
The impact of inflammatory rheumatic diseases on the presentation, severity, and outcome of acute coronary syndrome.
Clin Rheumatol., (2016), 35 pp. 233-237
[4]
R. Mehran, S.V. Rao, D.L. Bhatt, et al.
Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium.
Circulation., (2011), 123 pp. 2736-2747
[5]
E. Abu-Assi, A. López-López, V. González-Salvado, et al.
El riesgo de eventos cardiovasculares tras un evento coronario agudo persiste elevado a pesar de la revascularización, especialmente durante el primer año.
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2016), 69 pp. 11-18
[6]
A. Garay, A. Ariza-Solé, E. Abu-Assi, V. Lorente, J.C. Sánchez-Salado, A. Cequier.
Predicción del riesgo hemorrágico a medio plazo tras un síndrome coronario agudo: una asignatura pendiente.
Rev Esp Cardiol., (2016), 69 pp. 527-529
Copyright © 2016. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Are you a healthcare professional authorized to prescribe or dispense medications?