ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2023 7.2
Vol. 59. Num. 2.
Pages 180-182 (February 2006)

Effect of Exercise on Systolic Left Ventricular Outflow Velocity in Healthy Adults

Efecto del ejercicio sobre las velocidades de flujo sistólico ventricular izquierdo en adultos sanos

Fernando Cabrera BuenoaIsabel Rodríguez-BailónaRaúl López-SalgueroaJuan J Gómez-DoblasaJosé M García-PinillaaEduardo de Teresa Galvána

Options

The occurrence of exercise-induced dynamic obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract in patients without cardiomyopathy has recently been reported. However, it is not known if this phenomenon is a normal response to exercise in healthy adults. We studied 23 healthy adults using exercise Doppler echocardiography. We measured the left ventricular outflow velocity at rest and after maximum tolerated exercise. After a mean exercise duration of 12 min 45 s (2 min 32 s), the heart rate was 97.61 (6.71)% of the theoretical maximum. Left ventricular outflow velocity increased from 1.07 (0.18) m/s (range: 0.77-1.44 m/s) to 1.58 (0.35) m/s (range: 1.09-2.4 m/s). In healthy adults, exercise increased the left ventricular outflow velocity by 50%, though in no subject was it greater than 2.5 m/s. This observation appears to rule out the possibility that a high intraventricular pressure gradient is a normal response to exercise in healthy adults.

Keywords

Exercise echocardiography
Left intraventricular pressure gradient
Left ventricle

INTRODUCTION

Cases of exercise-induced left intraventricular pressure gradient detected thru exercise Doppler echocardiography have been reported recently.1-3 The clinical significance of this condition has not been definitively established although it may be related to symptoms of dyspnea or effort angina of no apparent cause.2,3

The presence of small pressure gradients in healthy ventricles, detected with high fidelity 6-10 mm Hg magnitude micromanometers was described some years ago.4,5 More recently, Yotti et al6 confirmed their existence and the possibility of recording them with Doppler echocardiography. However, the information available about flow velocity behavior and intraventricular gradients during exercise in healthy adults7 is limited. Consequently, values that might be considered "normal" during exercise are poorly-defined.

The objective of this study is to analyze the behavior of systolic left ventricular outflow velocity (SLVO) during exercise in healthy adults.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

We studied 23 healthy, male volunteers, without pathologic antecedents whose physical examination, electrocardiogram and Doppler echocardiogram gave normal results.

Baseline and post-exercise echocardiography was performed by an experienced cardiologist with a VingMed echocardiograph equipped with Super-VHS recording system and Pinnacle DV500 Plus video-digitalizer, using a 2.5-3.25 MHz probe

We performed a complete standard baseline Doppler echocardiogram. Measurements were taken according to American Society of Echocardiography recommendations.8

Immediately after exercise (30-60 s), with the volunteer in lateral decubitus, we again analyzed SLVO, transmitral flow and systolic function.

Exercise was taken on a Marquette Case 8000 treadmill ergometer (Marquette Medical Systems Inc., Milwaukee, US) following the Bruce protocol after 4 hours fasting, and continued until subjects presented symptoms of exhaustion or achieved maximum theoretical heart rate.

RESULTS

The 23 subjects were men of age 32.5±5.9 years (range, 25-45), weight 78.7±7.1 kg, height 176.6±4.9 cm, mean body mass index 25.7±2.4, and body surface area 1.94±0.09 (range, 1.74±2.13). Baseline echocardiogram data appears in Table 1. Maximum SLVO velocity at rest was 0.77-1.44 m/s, mean 1.07±0.18 m/s.

Mean exercise time was 12 min 45 s±2 min 32 s after which subjects achieved a mean heart rate of 97.6±6.7% of the estimated theoretical maximum for their age. Data relative to performance is in Table 2.

Following exercise (Table 3), maximum SLVO velocity was 1.09-2.45 m/s (mean, 1.58±0.35 m/s). None of the subjects presented morphology indicating dynamic gradient or anterior movement of the mitral valve.

DISCUSSION

The appearance of left intraventricular gradients in patients without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is well documented in relation to hypercontractile states,9 following valvular surgery,10-13 acute coronary syndromes,14,15 or dobutamine stress echocardiography.16,17 Recently, it has also been reported in relation with exercise.1-3,18 Elsewhere, we reported on a series3 that constitued a population with high incidence of hypertension and of women in which the only predictor factor of this phenomenon was left ventricular outflow tract diameter.

However, the presence of small intraventricular gradients in healthy ventricles is known. In 1980, Falsetti et al4 found 2.10±0.47 mm Hg gradients between the left ventricular apex and base using high precision micromanometers in dogs. Later, Pasipoularides et al5 also used catheters in 6 patients without valvular or ventricular abnormalities and found gradients at rest of 6.7±1.9 mm Hg, which increased to 13±2.3 mm Hg following bicycle exercise. More recently, Yotti et al6 have confirmed the existence of this phenomenon and the possibility of recording it using a new echocardiographic method, detecting values of 3.3±1.6 mm Hg in 20 healthy volunteers at rest.

However, little data is available on the behavior of these small "physiologic" gradients during physical exercise.7 In the series of 6 cases, Pasipoularides et al5 specifically studied this aspect and found that gradients doubled with submaximal physical exercise of decubitus pedaling.

Various studies19,20 related with the effects of exercise show an increase in SLVO velocities during exercise and, although they studied different populations, none of them found a two-fold increase in flow velocity at rest.

In our series of 23 healthy volunteers, SLVO flow velocity exceeded 1.07±0.18 m/s (range, 0.77-1.44) at rest, reaching 1.58±0.35 m/s (range, 1.09-2.45) after exercise, which represents a 50% increase.

These data suggest that, in the post-exercise treadmill echocardiogram, SLVO velocities of 1.58±0.35 m/s, with a range of 1 up to 2.4 m/s can be considered normal.

We conclude that maximum exercise tolerated by healthy adults increases left ventricular outflow velocity by up to 50% but that in no case does it reach 2.5 m/s. Although this does not entirely exclude the possibility that elevated intraventricular gradients may be a habitual response to exercise in healthy adults, it does make this highly unlikely.

Limitations of the Study

In addition to the sample size, this study is limited by the fact that the SLVO velocities were recorded immediately after exercise and not during maximum exercise. This is inevitable with treadmill exercise but could lead to an underestimate, given the tendency to diminish in the minutes after ceasing exercise, despite the fact we recorded high levels of exercise (97.61±6.71%).

This series only included young men. Although this implies a bias in terms of gender and age, we considered on this study design to facilitate optimization of echocardiographic images (as pectoral anatomy is easier in men) and to attain high levels of exercise. Moreover, the appearance of dynamic obstruction during exercise has not been linked with gender.3

Use of the simplified Bernouilli equation to calculate intraventricular gradients in these cases is inexact due to the absence of anatomic obstruction and the relatively low velocities; consequently, it may be more adequate to express results in terms of velocity without transforming this into gradient, or rather, to apply the recently described method of measurement with color M-mode Doppler6.


Correspondence: Dr. F. Cabrera Bueno.
Madame Bovary, 21, casa 14. 29620 Torremolinos. Málaga. España.
E-mail: fonendo@hotmail.com

Received January 31, 2005.
Accepted for publication May 13, 2006.

Bibliography
[1]
Peteiro J, Montserrat L, Castro-Beiras A..
Labil subaortic obstruction during exercise stress echocardiography..
Am J Cardiol, (1999), 84 pp. 1119-23
[2]
Meimoun P, Benali T, Sayah S, Molkar D, Koubbi A, Luycx Bore A, et al..
Dyspnea of effort with an unusual cause: diagnostic significance of stress echocardiography..
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, (2003), 96 pp. 914-8
[3]
Cabrera Bueno F, Rodríguez Bailón I, López Salguero R, Gómez Doblas JJ, Pérez Cabeza A, Peña Hernández J, et al..
Obstrucción dinámica intraventricular izquierda inducida por esfuerzo..
Rev Esp Cardiol, (2004), 57 pp. 1179-87
[4]
Falsetti HL, Verani MS, Chen CJ, Cramer JA..
Regional pressure differences in the left ventricle..
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, (1980), 6 pp. 123-34
[5]
Pasipoularides A, Murgo JP, Miller JW, Craig WE..
Nonobstructive left ventricular ejection pressure gradients in man..
Circ Res, (1987), 61 pp. 220-7
[6]
Yotti R, Bermejo J, Antoranz JC, Rojo-Álvarez JL, Allue C, Silva J, et al..
Noninvasive assessment of ejection intraventricular pressure gradients..
J Am Coll Cardiol, (2004), 43 pp. 1654-62
[7]
Yotti R..
¿Qué significado tiene un gradiente de presión intraventricular sistólico durante el ejercicio? Rev Esp Cardiol, (2004), 57 pp. 1139-42
[8]
Quinones MA, Otto CM, Stoddard M, Waggoner A, Zoghbi WA..
Recommendations for quantification of Doppler echocardiography: a report from the Doppler quantification task force of the nomenclature and standards committee of the American Society of Echocardiography..
J Am Soc Echocardiogr, (2002), 15 pp. 167-84
[9]
Gallet B, Quintard H, Fruchaud J, Hiltgen M..
Dynamic left ventricular obstruction associated with a pheochromocytoma reversible after tumor ablation..
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss, (2001), 94 pp. 1195-8
[10]
Kronzon I, Cohen ML, Winer HE, Colvin SB..
Left ventricular outflow obstruction: a complication of mitral valvuloplasty..
J Am Coll Cardiol, (1984), 4 pp. 825-8
[11]
Melero JM, Rodríguez I, Such M, Porras C, Olalla E..
Left ventricular outflow tract obstruction with mitral mechanical prosthesis..
Ann Thorac Surg, (1999), 68 pp. 255-7
[12]
Bartunek J, Sys SU, Rodrigues AC, van Schuerbeeck E, Mortier L, de Bruyne B..
Abnormal systolic intraventricular flow velocities after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Mechanisms, predictive factors, and prognostic significance..
Circulation, (1996), 93 pp. 712-9
[13]
López Ayerbe J, Evangelista Masip A, Armada Romero E, Mateos González M, González Alujas MT, García del Castillo H, et al..
Predictive factors of abnormal dynamic intraventricular gradient after valve replacement in severe aortic stenosis..
Rev Esp Cardiol, (2002), 55 pp. 127-34
[14]
Haley JH, Sinak LJ, Tajik AJ, Ommen SR, Oh JK..
Dynamic left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in acute coronary syndromes: an important cause of new systolic murmur and cardiogenic shock..
Mayo Clin Proc, (1999), 74 pp. 901-6
[15]
san Roman Sánchez D, Medina O, Jiménez F, Rodríguez JC, Nieto V..
Dynamic intraventricular obstruction in acute myocardial infarction..
Echocardiography, (2001), 18 pp. 515-8
[16]
Pellikka PA, Oh JK, Bailey KR, Nichols BA, Monahan KH, Tajik AJ..
Dynamic intraventricular obstruction during dobutamine stress echocardiography. A new observation..
Circulation, (1992), 86 pp. 1429-32
[17]
Christiaens L, Duplantier C, Allal J, Donal E, Nanadoumgar H, Barraine R, et al..
Normal coronary angiogram and dobutamine-induced left ventricular obstruction during stress echocardiography: a higher hemodynamic responsiveness to dobutamine..
Echocardiography, (2001), 18 pp. 285-90
[18]
Meimoun P, Benali T, Sayah S, Luyex-Bore A, Maitre B, Tribouilloy C..
Significance of systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve during dobutamine stress echocardiography..
J Am Soc Echocardiogr, (2005), 18 pp. 49-56
[19]
Lev EI, Pines A, Drory Y, Rotmensch HH, Tenenbaum A, Fisman EZ..
Exercise-induced aortic flow parameters in early postmenopausal women and middle-aged men..
J Int Med, (1998), 243 pp. 275-80
[20]
Stoylen A, Wisloff U, Slordahl S..
Left ventricular mechanics during exercise: a Doppler and tissue Doppler study..
Eur J Echocardiogr, (2003), 4 pp. 286-91
Are you a healthcare professional authorized to prescribe or dispense medications?