ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2023 7.2
Vol. 69. Num. 11.
Pages 1101 (November 2016)

Ecg contest
ECG, November 2016

ECG de noviembre de 2016

Ricardo Salgado ArandaFrancisco Javier García FernándezFrancisco Javier Martín González
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2016;69:121810.1016/j.rec.2016.05.035
Ricardo Salgado Aranda, Francisco Javier García Fernández, Francisco Javier Martín González

Options

An 83-year-old man who had undergone implantation of a DDDR pacemaker (Evia DR-T, Biotronik, Berlin, Germany) due to paroxysmal atrioventricular block, had a routine electrocardiogram (Figure 1), that revealed sinus rhythm with premature ventricular contractions in bigeminy and pacemaker spikes superimposed on the QRS of the sinus beats. As a malfunction of the device was suspected, it was subjected to interrogation. All the parameters were normal (atrium/ventricle: P/R wave sensing, 2.3/13mV; impedance, 236/634 Ω, and threshold, 0.3/0.7V at 0.4ms). Figure 2 shows a tracing obtained with the programmer.

Figure 1
(0.42MB).
Figure 2
(0.46MB).

In view of these values, is this a case of a real pacemaker malfunction?

  • 1.

    If the pacing and sensing parameters are normal, there is no malfunction.

  • 2.

    The pacemaker is functioning perfectly. This is a case of fusion: pacing by the device and the appearance of the conducted QRS occur simultaneously.

  • 3.

    Despite the fact that the R wave measured during the interrogation was normal, there is a defect in ventricular sensing.

  • 4.

    This situation could be resolved by increasing the ventricular pacing pulse amplitude.

Suggest a solution to this ECG Contest at http://www.revespcardiol.org/en/electroreto/69/11. The answer will be published in the next issue (December 2016). #RetoECG.

Copyright © 2016. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Are you a healthcare professional authorized to prescribe or dispense medications?