ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2023 7.2
Vol. 71. Num. 9.
Pages 754 (September 2018)

Ecg contest
Response to ECG, August 2018

Respuesta al ECG de agosto de 2018

Ana Andrés LahuertaJoaquín Osca AsensiVíctor José Donoso Trenado
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2018;71:67110.1016/j.rec.2018.01.021
Ana Andrés Lahuerta, Joaquín Osca Asensi, Víctor José Donoso Trenado

Options

Figure 1
(0.28MB).
Figure 2
(0.16MB).

The ECG recording during tachycardia shows a longer QRS interval than in sinus rhythm (115ms). There are differences in the QRS morphology of tachycardia (90° axis during tachycardia vs 30° in sinus rhythm; negative complex in leads I and aVL in tachycardia vs positive complex in sinus rhythm) without meeting the criteria for aberrant conduction (Figure 1). Supraventricular tachycardia is ruled out (answers 1 and 2, incorrect). Prior to adenosine administration, a notched T wave can be observed in the lower leads, which could correspond to an atrial mechanism. An atrial/ventricular ratio of 1:1 is observed (Figure 2A). After adenosine administration, which interrupts ventriculoatrial conduction, atrioventricular dissociation can be observed (Figure 2B), confirming that this is ventricular tachycardia with 1:1 ventriculoatrial conduction (there is an effect of adenosine on the tachycardia but without conversion to sinus rhythm, thus ruling out option 3). The correct answer is therefore number 4: the electrophysiological diagnosis was idiopathic right ventricular outflow tract tachycardia.

Copyright © 2018. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Are you a healthcare professional authorized to prescribe or dispense medications?