ISSN: 1885-5857 Impact factor 2023 7.2
Vol. 76. Num. 12.
Pages 970-979 (December 2023)

Original article
Reappraisal of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for diagnosis and management of cardiac implantable electronic device infections

Reevaluación del diagnóstico y el tratamiento de las infecciones de dispositivos de electroestimulación cardiaca mediante [18F]FDG-PET/CT

Marta Hernández-Menesesa1Andrés Perissinottibc1Silvia Páez-MartínezaJaume LlopisdAnders DahleElena SandovalfCarlos FalcesgJuan AmbrosioniahBárbara VidalgFrancesc MarcoiGuillermo CuervoaAsunción MorenoaJordi BoschiJosé M. TolosanagDavid FusterbJosé M. Miróah on behalf of the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona Infective Endocarditis Team Investigators

Options

Imagen extra
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2023;76:970-9
Abstract
Introduction and objectives

The role of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections requires better evaluation, especially in the diagnosis of systemic infections. We aimed to determine the following: a) the diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each CIED topographical region, b) the added value of [18F]FDG-PET/CT over transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in diagnosing systemic infections, c) spleen and bone marrow uptake in differentiating isolated local infections from systemic infections, and d) the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in follow-up.

Methods

Retrospective single-center study including 54 cases and 54 controls from 2014 to 2021. The Primary endpoint was the diagnostic yield of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in each topographical CIED region. Secondary analyses described the performance of [18F]FDG-PET/CT compared with that of TEE in systemic infections, bone marrow and spleen uptake in systemic and isolated local infections, and the potential application of [18F]FDG-PET/CT in guiding cessation of chronic antibiotic suppression when completed device removal is not performed.

Results

We analyzed 13 (24%) isolated local infections and 41 (76%) systemic infections. Overall, the specificity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT was 100% and sensitivity 85% (79% pocket, 57% subcutaneous lead, 22% endovascular lead, 10% intracardiac lead). When combined with TEE, [18F]FDG-PET/CT increased definite diagnosis o fsystemic infections from 34% to 56% (P=.04). Systemic infections with bacteremia showed higher spleen (P=.05) and bone marrow metabolism (P=.04) than local infections. Thirteen patients without complete device removal underwent a follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT, with no relapses after discontinuation of chronic antibiotic suppression in 6 cases with negative follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT.

Conclusions

The sensitivity of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for evaluating CIED infections was high in local infections but much lower in systemic infections. However, accuracy increased when [18F]FDG-PET/CT was combined with TEE in endovascular lead bacteremic infection. Spleen and bone marrow hypermetabolism could differentiate bacteremic systemic infection from local infection. Although further prospective studies are needed, follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT could play a potential role in the management of chronic antibiotic suppression therapy when complete device removal is unachievable.

Keywords

[18F]FDG-PET/CT
CIED infections
Diagnosis
Pocket infections
Lead endocarditis

Identify yourself

Not yet a subscriber to the journal?

Purchase access to the article

By purchasing the article, the PDF of the same can be downloaded

Price: 19,34 €

Phone for incidents

Monday to Friday from 9am to 6pm (GMT+1) except for the months of July and August, which will be from 9am to 3pm

Calls from Spain 932 415 960
Calls from outside Spain +34 932 415 960
Copyright © 2023. Sociedad Española de Cardiología
Are you a healthcare professional authorized to prescribe or dispense medications?